It's the fifth anniversary of No Child Left Behind and we can consider the law a success despite serious flaws.
The federal education law is based on a yearly benchmark test that can't possibly measure real learning for all students accurately. The law is full of underfunded and onerous mandates. The achievement targets are unobtainable and the accountability component has too many problems to even list here.
As a member of the Governor's Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens and as a parent, I am deeply saddened by the recent News Journal article quoting Red Clay Superintendent Andrzejewski saying that "by definition" students in special education cannot earn a proficient score on the Delaware Student Testing Program.
While the article indicated Dr. Andrzejewski was trained as a special ed teacher, his ideas have not been considered best practice in the education community for more than 30 years.
Recent articles about which schools in the Red Clay School District should be accountable for test scores of special education students points to serious problems in the way we are educating children. Special education should not be considered a place, but rather the process by which children with disabilities get the extra support and services they need to learn.
In December, one of our parents, Phyllis Guinivan, attended an Administrators and Supervisors meeting to help us understand how our schools unintentionally create barriers for students and families with physical / mobility challenges. She shared both pictures and personal experiences of what it’s like to bring a child in a wheelchair into our schools. "Schools may meet the ADA technical requirements," she said, "but functionally they are inaccessible."
The next night after her presentation, I walked into a holiday concert through the entrance closest to the stage. As I stepped into the auditorium, I was delighted to see a student I know has multiple impairments including using a wheelchair singing with the choir. Yet, I was so dismayed when the choir finished to see that he had to be lifted out of the orchestra pit because a ramp does not yet exist at that school.
For the past decade, states across the nation have been setting high academic content standards for all children, and developing assessment and accountability systems to ensure that all children learn to very high levels. Federal legislation, including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA) and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), provides guidelines and expectations for implementation of inclusive instruction and assessment. States, districts, and schools are now keenly attuned to state assessments that are used to measure student achievement on academic content standards.
Special-needs kids should count too
By PAT HEFFERNAN
02/06/2006
In the Red Clay School District, the poor performance of students attending alternate schools is affecting the standings of those students' home schools. House Bill 349 has been introduced by state Rep. Wayne Smith as a way to address this problem. It may have severe negative consequences.
The information provided on this site is for informational purposes and is not an endorsement or recommendation for treatment, diagnosis or services. Individuals with special needs are unique and all options must be explored by the family, professionals and that individual. We are not meant to be a replacement for professional medical or legal advice.